Susan Farbstein on Human Rights Law

Human rights lawyer on law’s ability to promote justice—and shape public understanding

Susan Farbstein smiles while standing outside in front of a building with columns and surrounding greenery, wearing a light blue blouse.

Susan Farbstein  |  Photograph by Jim harrison

“Why do some people get to make decisions about their lives, and other people don’t?” Susan Farbstein, J.D. ’04, clinical professor of law since 2008, first pondered the question after observing the stigma faced by patients visiting her father, a hematologist-oncologist who treated people with HIV and AIDS in the 1980s. Since then, she has continued to think about human dignity and autonomy—and how the law can promote them. After law school, Farbstein worked at the International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ) in South Africa on projects seeking “accountability, broadly conceived” for apartheid-era abuses. “It’s not just about criminal accountability; it’s not just about who is guilty,” she says. “It’s also about what the survivor wants”: an apology, structural change, or an opportunity to tell her story. This survivor-centered conception of accountability has helped Farbstein see the law’s impacts beyond legal rulings, shaping people’s understandings of themselves and the underlying events. At Harvard, she leads the International Human Rights Clinic: a group of six faculty and about 30 students who are partnering with a Ukrainian human rights organization to consider how to build a case against Russia for war crimes. Farbstein educates students on human rights law, and also how best to approach such heavy work—by building resilience and avoiding burnout. She does so by returning to favorite hobbies from her California childhood: swimming (“my happy, quiet place”) and hiking with her family. The beliefs she held then continue to motivate her. “At the most basic level, the idea of human rights is that they’re something you’re entitled to by virtue of being human,” she says: “that all people should be able to lead a dignified life, and all people should be able to make choices for themselves about the life that they will lead.”

Read more articles by Nina Pasquini

You might also like

On Open to Debate, the Harvard economist defended free market competition—with meaningful government involvement. 

Plus, veteran higher education leader Thomas Ehrlich reflects on university curricula for his 70th reunion

The play Spare Parts is a contemporary fable about the quest to live forever.

Most popular

Social Media Use and Adult Depression

A survey reveals suprising links between social media use and depression in adults.

All That’s Unseen charts the Harvard graduate’s uneasy journey from Appalachia to Cambridge and back.  

The 1884 Cannibalism-at-Sea Case That Still Has Harvard Talking

The Queen v. Dudley and Stephens changed the course of legal history. Here’s why it’s been fodder for countless classroom debates.

Explore More From Current Issue

Modern building with large glass windows, surrounded by greenery and pedestrians.

A roundup of University news from the summer of 2026

Caricature of a young man in front of red doors, wearing a green striped sweater.

In 1954, Gregory Corso moved into Eliot House. How he stayed there is a literary legend.

A vibrant illustration of a red car parked, surrounded by cheerful people and historic buildings.

Derek Bok donated his car for a good cause.